Closing the Responsible Gambling Tool Uptake Gap: How Modest Incentives Nudge Players Toward Positive Play
Session Title
Responsible Gambling: Tools & Self-Assessment
Presentation Type
Paper Presentation
Start Date
26-5-2026 12:00 AM
Abstract
Pre-commitment tools reduce gambling-related harm, yet uptake remains low. We conducted two field studies testing whether modest incentives can increase enrollment. In Study 1, casino players were randomly offered a $10 food-court voucher to enroll in a monetary pre-commitment tool (n = 393 incentive; n = 370 control). Although there was no main effect of the incentive, gambling literacy moderated outcomes: players low in gambling literacy were most likely to enroll when incentivized. Study 2 was a preregistered randomized controlled trial delivered through a casino operator’s digital wallet (n = 158 incentive; n = 156 control). Participants received either standard information about the deposit-limit tool or the same information plus 500 loyalty points (value = $5 USD). Incentivized players were more likely to click the enrollment link (36.1% vs. 25.0%) and substantially more likely to enroll based on account verification (17.1% vs. 2.1%). These studies provide rare real-world evidence that even small, low-cost incentives can move the needle on responsible gambling behavior. For operators and regulators, embedding modest rewards into existing loyalty infrastructures represents a scalable, practical pathway to drive meaningful increases in pre-commitment adoption. Specifcially, incentives can help close the long-standing gap between tool availability and real-world use.
Closing the Responsible Gambling Tool Uptake Gap: How Modest Incentives Nudge Players Toward Positive Play
Pre-commitment tools reduce gambling-related harm, yet uptake remains low. We conducted two field studies testing whether modest incentives can increase enrollment. In Study 1, casino players were randomly offered a $10 food-court voucher to enroll in a monetary pre-commitment tool (n = 393 incentive; n = 370 control). Although there was no main effect of the incentive, gambling literacy moderated outcomes: players low in gambling literacy were most likely to enroll when incentivized. Study 2 was a preregistered randomized controlled trial delivered through a casino operator’s digital wallet (n = 158 incentive; n = 156 control). Participants received either standard information about the deposit-limit tool or the same information plus 500 loyalty points (value = $5 USD). Incentivized players were more likely to click the enrollment link (36.1% vs. 25.0%) and substantially more likely to enroll based on account verification (17.1% vs. 2.1%). These studies provide rare real-world evidence that even small, low-cost incentives can move the needle on responsible gambling behavior. For operators and regulators, embedding modest rewards into existing loyalty infrastructures represents a scalable, practical pathway to drive meaningful increases in pre-commitment adoption. Specifcially, incentives can help close the long-standing gap between tool availability and real-world use.