Document Type

Article

Publication Date

2-4-2026

Publication Title

Heliyon

Volume

12

Issue

3

First page number:

1

Last page number:

9

Abstract

Background: Practice patterns of surgical management of rectal adenocarcinoma vary among US regions. Nationwide, there has been an overall trend toward the performance of anterior resection (AR) over abdominoperineal resection (APR) in the surgical management of invasive rectal adenocarcinoma when feasible. It is suspected that this trend is adopted at a slower rate in underserved regions of the United States. Methods: Data from the NCDB for 2004–2019 was queried for patients with stage I-III rectal adenocarcinoma who underwent anterior resection (AR) or abdominoperineal resection (APR). Comparisons of AR versus APR were made among year, region, approach, and stage. Results: Of 160,070 cases, 73,673 (76.0 %) underwent AR and 23,273 (24 %) underwent APR. AR rate in 2016–2019 was 77.6 % versus 74.2 % in 2004–2007. APR rate in 2016–2019 was 22.4 % versus 25.8 % in 2004–2007. AR rate was highest in Middle Atlantic. APR rate was highest in West North Central. Robotic approach was highest in West North Central. Laparoscopic approach was highest in New England. Open/unspecified approach was highest in East South Central. Conclusions: AR cases are trending upward with a corresponding downward trend in APR cases. Adoption of AR is gradual and varies among regions, but rates of APR still remain high.

Keywords

Rectal Cancer; Anterior resection; Abdominoperineal resection; region; Trends

Disciplines

Cancer Biology | Cell Anatomy

File Format

PDF

File Size

625 KB

Language

English

Rights

IN COPYRIGHT. For more information about this rights statement, please visit http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Download

UNLV article access

Search your library

Share

COinS